As a former educator, I am frequently asked my opinion on the great send-the-children-back-to-school-in-the-fall debate. Will it be safe? Is it wise? And the inevitable question: What would you do if they were your kids?
My short answer? It’s complicated!
I lived the first twenty-two years of my life preparing, as it happened, for a career in education, and I’ve spent the most recent twenty-two years in happy retirement. The intervening thirty-two years had me working as a teacher, vice-principal, principal, HR superintendent, and finally school district superintendent (director of education) in two jurisdictions. Those jobs were sometimes more challenging than I might have wished, often more difficult than I could have imagined, yet, thankfully, always rewarding.
During my working years, the security and health of everyone I was responsible for—pupils, teachers, and business operations staff—were of paramount concern to me. Everyone was entitled to a safe learning environment: one free of harassment in whatever guise; one free of assault or intimidation in any form; one clean and in good repair; one equipped with up-to-date learning materials and curricula; an environment welcoming and open to all.
I don’t say those objectives were always fully met, but any shortcomings were never due to lack of effort and good intent.
Today’s students and education workers learn and teach in an environment similar in many ways to that which I inhabited, the many advances in technology notwithstanding. But there is one major difference they face just now, a threat the likes of which we have never encountered before to this degree. The COVID-19 virus is a stealthy, merciless, oft-fatal disease that stalks us all, old or young, especially if we congregate in significant numbers in indoor spaces.
A prime example of such spaces: schools!
And so, the great question: Should we be sending kids back to school this fall? And I do have a longer answer.
During the final years of my career, the provincial government removed from locally-elected school trustees the power to levy taxes for educational purposes. This left school districts totally reliant on government grants to pay for the costs associated with the provision of an education appropriate to their local communities—communities often poorly understood by the government decision-makers. As a result, those grants frequently proved insufficient to the needs, and continue to be inadequate to this day.
Whether the school district was located in a large urban environment, or in a remote, northern rural area, the special needs associated with their discrete makeup were only partially accommodated when funds were allocated. In the years since I left the profession, although the actual dollar amount of those grants has increased, it has not matched the concomitant cost-of-living growth.
Hence, I believe it is not safe to send kids back to school this fall—nor all those who will accompany them back—without a significant expenditure of money to ensure their health and safety. And it is the government’s responsibility to do this.
Many school districts across the province already have a staggering backlog of capital repairs that are needed to aging buildings, undertakings they cannot afford with current funding. Believe it or not, there are still schools burdened with asbestos and lead plumbing, not because people don’t understand the need to replace them, but because they haven’t the funds. There are schools with leaking roofs, aging wiring, saggy floors, inadequate heating and cooling, and windows that won’t open.
Absent COVID-19, everyone would have been going back into those buildings this fall to cope as best they could with such conditions. It’s inconceivable to me that they would be allowed back without massive measures to safeguard them against the relentless virus preying on the land.
Scientists and medical professionals know better than I how money might best be spent. Here is a partial list only, gleaned from my reading of many of their posts—
- developing ongoing channels of communication with provincial and local health departments to stay updated on COVID-19 transmission and response, including contact tracing in the event of a positive case,
- making decisions that take into account the level of local community transmission,
- deep-cleaning and disinfecting school buildings daily, especially water and sanitation facilities,
- increasing airflow and ventilation in schools,
- promoting best hand-washing and hygiene practices for everyone, and providing hygiene supplies,
- providing children with information about how to protect themselves, in ways that are developmentally appropriate,
- implementing multiple SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies, such as social distancing, cloth face-coverings, and hand hygiene,
- holding school in shifts to ensure smaller class sizes,
- staggering mealtimes and breaks at school,
- re-purposing unused or underutilized school (or community) spaces for classroom use,
- moving classes to temporary spaces or outdoors,
- integrating SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies into co-curricular and extra-curricular activities,
- limiting or cancelling participation in activities where social distancing is not feasible,
- developing a proactive plan for when a student or staff member tests positive for COVID-19,
- supporting the mental health of students and staff, and combating any stigma against people who have been sick, and
- educating parents and caregivers on the importance of monitoring for and responding to the symptoms of COVID-19 at home.
Most important of all, perhaps, is the need to engage and encourage everyone in the school and community to practice preventive behaviours. That is the most crucial action to support schools’ safe reopening, and to help them stay open. Until transmission rates in local communities are reduced to an acceptable level, it will be unsafe to send anyone back.
Most of the experts I’ve read believe children should be going back to school, not just for the sake of our economy, but for their own emotional welfare. But only if it is safe for them to do so.
So, how much will all these measures cost? I confess I have no idea; I am too long departed from the scene. I have read different estimates from government sources, unions, teacher associations, and parent advocacy groups. Perhaps a consensus is possible.
But whatever the amount, it is not too much if it ensures the safety and well-being of all who head back to school in September, because there is one thing that has not changed since I last was there—the education of our children is not an expense; it is an investment in the future of our country.
And that fact is not complicated at all!
An excellent summary of the issues facing the world of education and getting the children back to school safely. It is hard to argue against any of the points you raise.
However the big question that you do not raise is who is going to pay for this much needed transformation – and the need is immediate. Do we just print more money?? Yes in the short term but not without the proviso that we need to have a major review of the educational system and ask two questions of it.
1) Are we getting value for money – are the children receiving an education which fits the needs of 2020 and beyond.
2) Should the individual taxpayer be required to pay more taxes to cover the education and health budgetary increases. All of this with a 10% unemployment?
3) If the private sector are required to fund these increases then they should have the right for huge input in to the curriculum particularly in the secondary and adult education sectors.
4) There must also be a huge drive at the same time to cut the costs of the public sector by 20% over the next five years.
5) Already we are seeing a huge difference between the effect of lay offs and redundancies between the public and private sectors – from a society perspective is that fair?
6) I will pose one more question which I believe encapsulates the dilemma the government faces. Should the government of Ontario continue to subsidise Ford in Oakville at the expense of a major input in to the educational sector. There is an assumption that they cannot do both – I realise that – but I use it as an example of the issues the government must grapple with.
Personally i would support full support of the Medical and health issues at the expense of ALL other government expenditures – even if it means a short term increase in unemployment.
Dick
LikeLike
Wow, your reply could generate a whole new post! But here are a few short comments—-
1) Are we getting value for money – are the children receiving an education which fits the needs of 2020 and beyond.
Increasingly so, I believe…..although a prime purpose for public education at the early levels remains ‘custodial/child care’, as the recent shutdown has demonstrated
2) Should the individual taxpayer be required to pay more taxes to cover the education and health budgetary increases. All of this with a 10% unemployment?
Yes, by those who can afford to pay more…..societal needs must be paid for
3) If the private sector are required to fund these increases then they should have the right for huge input in to the curriculum particularly in the secondary and adult education sectors.
I agree
4) There must also be a huge drive at the same time to cut the costs of the public sector by 20% over the next five years.
More efficient delivery of social services is a worthy goal
5) Already we are seeing a huge difference between the effect of lay offs and redundancies between the public and private sectors – from a society perspective is that fair?
Guaranteed basic income, replacing many other social benefits, might level the playing field, and allow those ‘furloughed’ to retrain and re-skill
The government must continue to spend whatever it takes to transition us over this pandemic time…..nobody else can print the money.
Thanks for the comments!
LikeLike
Well said Brad!
LikeLike
Glad you liked it!
LikeLike
Well put Brad. When will we ever learn? Bill Harris
LikeLike
Glad you liked it, Bill…..thanks for taking time to comment.
LikeLike